Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217898›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2023

Application of a peer learning and assessment model in an undergraduate pharmacy course.

Liyuan Yang, Yi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liyuan YangSchool of Medicine and Pharmacy, Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Yi WangSchool of Medicine and Pharmacy, Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. wangyi0213@ouc.edu.cn.
Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Key project of undergraduate education and teaching research of Ocean University of China No. 2020ZD06Teacher Teaching Development Fund of Ocean University of China No. 2018JXJJ13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and accurate feedback is a crucial component for effective undergraduate learning. However, with the expansion of university enrolment in China, student numbers have increased rapidly and, in traditional university classrooms, it is often difficult for the teacher - as the only evaluator - to accommodate students' diverse needs and learning styles, and provide timely learning feedback. In our teaching practice research, we combined mutual peer evaluation with cooperative learning, and proposed a peer learning and assessment model (PLAM) that encouraged students to cooperate and compete, leading to greater efficiency in giving feedback. The ultimate goal was to improve students' learning ability. This study aimed to investigate the effect and influencing factors of PLAM in an undergraduate course entitled 'Medicinal Chemistry of Natural Products'.

methodsWe surveyed the entire pharmacy student body (95 students). Each student was required to provide feedback to the other members within the same study group and students in other groups. We evaluated the effectiveness of PLAM in five aspects: basic information, learning attitude, participation, interpersonal relationship, and organizational approach. The questionnaire was administered online using the Star survey platform. Data were exported to Excel and meta-analysis was performed using SPSS.

resultsPLAM effectively increased feedback efficiency, enhancing students' learning interest and ability. An ordered logistic regression analysis model was used to analyze the factors influencing the PLAM learning effect. Three factors - learning attitude, participation, and interpersonal relationship - explained up to 71.3% of the model.

conclusionsThe PLAM adopted in this research is an effective learning and evaluation model that can promote collaborative learning and increase learning enthusiasm. It is more suitable for knowledge expansion learning and comprehensive practical learning where teachers cannot be present for the entire process. Students should be encouraged to establish appropriate learning attitudes and a positive group atmosphere. PLAM can positively impact college curriculum learning and could be extended to other teaching domains.

Indexed as

PharmacyStudents, PharmacyCurriculumFeedbackHumansLearningPeer GroupFeedback efficiencyLearning abilityPeer assessmentPeer learningPharmacy education in university

Identifiers

PMID37217898
PMCPMC10204209
OpenAlexW4377292309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.