Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217878›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

An automated detection of epileptic seizures EEG using CNN classifier based on feature fusion with high accuracy.

Wenna Chen, Yixing Wang, Yuhao Ren, Hongwei Jiang, Ganqin Du, Jincan Zhang, Jinghua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Enhanced visibility graph for EEG classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenna Chen *The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Yixing Wang *College of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Yuhao RenCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Hongwei JiangThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China. jianghw@haust.edu.cn.
Ganqin DuThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China. dgq99@163.com.
Jincan ZhangCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China. zjc850126@163.com.
Jinghua LiCollege of Information Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpilepsy is a neurological disorder that is usually detected by electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Since manual examination of epilepsy seizures is a laborious and time-consuming process, lots of automatic epilepsy detection algorithms have been proposed. However, most of the available classification algorithms for epilepsy EEG signals adopted a single feature extraction, in turn to result in low classification accuracy. Although a small account of studies have carried out feature fusion, the computational efficiency is reduced due to too many features, because there are also some poor features that interfere with the classification results.

methodsIn order to solve the above problems, an automatic recognition method of epilepsy EEG signals based on feature fusion and selection is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the Approximate Entropy (ApEn), Fuzzy Entropy (FuzzyEn), Sample Entropy (SampEn), and Standard Deviation (STD) mixed features of the subband obtained by the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) decomposition of EEG signals are extracted. Secondly, the random forest algorithm is used for feature selection. Finally, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is used to classify epilepsy EEG signals.

resultsThe empirical evaluation of the presented algorithm is performed on the benchmark Bonn EEG datasets and New Delhi datasets. In the interictal and ictal classification tasks of Bonn datasets, the proposed model achieves an accuracy of 99.9%, a sensitivity of 100%, a precision of 99.81%, and a specificity of 99.8%. For the interictal-ictal case of New Delhi datasets, the proposed model achieves a classification accuracy of 100%, a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 100%, and a precision of 100%.

conclusionThe proposed model can effectively realize the high-precision automatic detection and classification of epilepsy EEG signals. This model can provide high-precision automatic detection capability for clinical epilepsy EEG detection. We hope to provide positive implications for the prediction of seizure EEG.

Indexed as

EpilepsySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSeizuresConvolutional neural networksEpilepsy detectionEpileptic EEG signal classificationFeature selectionRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID37217878
PMCPMC10201805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.