Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217826›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023

Clinical Phenotypes of PCOS: a Cross-Sectional Study.

Abdalla Moustafa Elsayed, Latifa Saad Al-Kaabi, Noora Mohammed Al-Abdulla, Moza Salem Al-Kuwari, Asmaa Abdulsamad Al-Mulla, Raghad Shaher Al-Shamari, Ahmed Khaled Alhusban, Ali Ahmed AlNajjar, Suhail A R Doi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. PCOS and Obesity: Contraception Challenges.Open access journal of contraception · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Oxidative Stress-From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdalla Moustafa ElsayedCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-0540
Latifa Saad Al-KaabiCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Noora Mohammed Al-AbdullaCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Moza Salem Al-KuwariCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Asmaa Abdulsamad Al-MullaCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Raghad Shaher Al-ShamariCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmed Khaled AlhusbanCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ali Ahmed AlNajjarCollege of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Suhail A R DoiDepartment of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. sdoi@qu.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examines the Doi-Alshoumer PCOS clinical phenotype classification in relation to measured clinical and biochemical characteristics of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Two cohorts of women (Kuwait and Rotterdam) diagnosed with PCOS (FAI > 4.5%) were examined. These phenotypes were created using neuroendocrine dysfunction (IRMA LH/FSH ratio > 1 or LH > 6 IU/L) and menstrual cycle status (oligo/amenorrhea) to create three phenotypes: (A) neuroendocrine dysfunction and oligo/amenorrhea, (B) without neuroendocrine dysfunction but with oligo/amenorrhea, and (C) without neuroendocrine dysfunction and with regular cycles. These phenotypes were compared in terms of hormonal, biochemical, and anthropometric measures. The three suggested phenotypes (A, B, and C) were shown to be sufficiently distinct in terms of hormonal, biochemical, and anthropometric measures. Patients who were classified as phenotype A had neuroendocrine dysfunction, excess LH (and LH/FSH ratio), irregular cycles, excess A4, infertility, excess T, highest FAI and E2, and excess 17αOHPG when compared to the other phenotypes. Patients classified as phenotype B had irregular cycles, no neuroendocrine dysfunction, obesity, acanthosis nigricans, and insulin resistance. Lastly, patients classified as phenotype C had regular cycles, acne, hirsutism, excess P4, and the highest P4 to E2 molar ratio. The differences across phenotypes suggested distinct phenotypic expression of this syndrome, and the biochemical and clinical correlates of each phenotype are likely to be useful in the management of women with PCOS. These phenotypic criteria are distinct from criteria used for diagnosis.

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeAmenorrheaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansPhenotypeFollicle Stimulating HormoneAndrostenedioneDoi-Alshoumer classificationHirsutismInsulin resistancePhenotypePolycystic ovary syndromeRotterdam criteria

Identifiers

PMID37217826
PMCPMC10643327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.