ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023
Directional Sensors for Recording Uterine EMG During Pregnancy.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multichannel uterine electromyography (uEMG) during pregnancy is traditionally performed with electrocardiography (ECG) sensors. Similar signals are often observed in two or more channels, suggesting the ECG sensors report activities originating from the same location on the uterus. To improve signal source localization, we designed a directional sensor or "Area Sensor". Here we compare Area Sensors with ECG sensors for source localization. Subjects were ≥ 38 wks experiencing regular contractions. 6 Area Sensors (n = 8) or 6 to 7 ECG sensors (n = 7) were used to record multichannel uEMG for 60 min. For each sensor type, the similarity of signals observed in pairs of channels during contractions was assessed by quantifying channel crosstalk. Since crosstalk depends on the separation between sensors, analyses were performed within distance groups: A 9-12 cm; B 13-16 cm; C 17-20 cm; D 21-24 cm; E ≥ 25 cm. For ECG sensors, crosstalk was 67.9 ± 14.4% in group A, decreasing to 27.8 ± 17.5% in group E. For Area Sensors, crosstalk was 24.6 ± 18.6% in Group A, decreasing to 12.5 ± 13.8% in group E. Area Sensors showed less crosstalk than ECG sensors in distance groups A, B, C and D, with all p < 0.002. Compared with ECG sensors, Area Sensors are more directional and report uterine activity from a smaller area of the uterine wall. Using 6 Area Sensors separated by at least 17 cm provides acceptably independent multichannel recording. This introduces the possibility of non-invasively evaluating uterine synchronization and the strength of individual uterine contractions in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.