Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217768›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

TRUSformer: improving prostate cancer detection from micro-ultrasound using attention and self-supervision.

Mahdi Gilany, Paul Wilson, Andrea Perera-Ortega, Amoon Jamzad, Minh Nguyen Nhat To, Fahimeh Fooladgar, Brian Wodlinger, Purang Abolmaesumi, Parvin Mousavi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Micro-ultrasound for prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ultrasound Image Analysis with Vision Transformers-Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mahdi Gilany *School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada. mahdi.gilany@queensu.ca.
Paul Wilson *School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Andrea Perera-OrtegaSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Amoon JamzadSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Minh Nguyen Nhat ToDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Fahimeh FooladgarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brian WodlingerExact Imaging, Markham, Canada.
Purang AbolmaesumiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Parvin MousaviSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA large body of previous machine learning methods for ultrasound-based prostate cancer detection classify small regions of interest (ROIs) of ultrasound signals that lie within a larger needle trace corresponding to a prostate tissue biopsy (called biopsy core). These ROI-scale models suffer from weak labeling as histopathology results available for biopsy cores only approximate the distribution of cancer in the ROIs. ROI-scale models do not take advantage of contextual information that are normally considered by pathologists, i.e., they do not consider information about surrounding tissue and larger-scale trends when identifying cancer. We aim to improve cancer detection by taking a multi-scale, i.e., ROI-scale and biopsy core-scale, approach.

methodsOur multi-scale approach combines (i) an "ROI-scale" model trained using self-supervised learning to extract features from small ROIs and (ii) a "core-scale" transformer model that processes a collection of extracted features from multiple ROIs in the needle trace region to predict the tissue type of the corresponding core. Attention maps, as a by-product, allow us to localize cancer at the ROI scale.

resultsWe analyze this method using a dataset of micro-ultrasound acquired from 578 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, and compare our model to baseline models and other large-scale studies in the literature. Our model shows consistent and substantial performance improvements compared to ROI-scale-only models. It achieves [Formula: see text] AUROC, a statistically significant improvement over ROI-scale classification. We also compare our method to large studies on prostate cancer detection, using other imaging modalities.

conclusionsTaking a multi-scale approach that leverages contextual information improves prostate cancer detection compared to ROI-scale-only models. The proposed model achieves a statistically significant improvement in performance and outperforms other large-scale studies in the literature. Our code is publicly available at www.github.com/med-i-lab/TRUSFormer .

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMalePelvisUltrasonographyMicro-ultrasoundProstate cancerSelf-attentionSelf-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37217768
OpenAlexW4377224908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.