Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217697›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Uterine arteries pulsatility index by Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yan Liu, Zilu Xie, Yong Huang, Xin Lu, Fengling Yin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive Value of Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index in Placental Insufficiency Across Gestational Stages in a Single Population.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Preeclampsia Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yan Liu *B Ultrasonic room, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang City, 222006, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4073-5410
Zilu Xie *Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Jing men no. 2 People's Hospital, Jingmen City, 448000, Hubei Province, China.
Yong HuangDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, Jiangjin Central Hospital, Chongqing, 402260, China.
Xin LuDepartment of Ultrasound Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an City, 721000, Shaanxi Province, China.
Fengling YinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, No. 199 Jiefang South Road, Quanshan District, Xuzhou City, 221000, Jiangsu Province, China. 18952172199@sina.cn.
First People’s Hospital of Jingmen · CNJiangjin Central Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNThe First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CNXuzhou Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication with serious potential risks for maternal and neonatal health. Early prediction of preeclampsia is crucial for timely prevention, surveillance, and treatment to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the prediction of preeclampsia based on Doppler ultrasound of uterine arteries at different gestational ages.

methodsA systematic literature search and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the pulsatility index of Doppler ultrasound of uterine arteries for predicting preeclampsia. The timing of ultrasound scans within and beyond 20 weeks of gestational age was compared to assess its effect on the sensitivity and specificity of the pulsatility index.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 27 studies and 81,673 subjects (3309 preeclampsia patients and 78,364 controls). The pulsatility index had moderate sensitivity (0.586) and high specificity for predicting preeclampsia (0.879) (summary point: sensitivity 0.59; 1-specificity 0.12). Subgroup analysis revealed that ultrasound scans performed within 20 weeks of gestational age did not significantly affect the sensitivity and specificity for predicting preeclampsia. The summary receiver operator characteristic curve showed the pulsatility index's optimal range of sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsThe uterine arteries pulsatility index measured by Doppler ultrasound is useful and effective for predicting preeclampsia and should be implemented in the clinical practice. The timing of ultrasound scans at different gestational age ranges does not significantly affect the sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Pre-EclampsiaUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalUterine ArteryFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySensitivity and SpecificityMeta-analysisPreeclampsiaPulsatility indexSensitivitySpecificityTiming

Identifiers

PMID37217697
OpenAlexW4377224842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.