Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Algorithm selection for protein-ligand docking: strategies and analysis on ACE.

Tianlai Chen, Xiwen Shu, Huiyuan Zhou, Floyd A Beckford, Mustafa Misir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-Component Synthesis of New Fluorinated-Pyrrolo[3,4-International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianlai ChenDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Xiwen ShuDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Huiyuan ZhouDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Floyd A BeckfordDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China. floyd.beckford@duke.edu.
Mustafa MisirDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China. mustafa.misir@dukekunshan.edu.cn.
Duke Kunshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the use of algorithm selection for automatically choosing an algorithm for any given protein-ligand docking task. In drug discovery and design process, conceptualizing protein-ligand binding is a major problem. Targeting this problem through computational methods is beneficial in order to substantially reduce the resource and time requirements for the overall drug development process. One way of addressing protein-ligand docking is to model it as a search and optimization problem. There have been a variety of algorithmic solutions in this respect. However, there is no ultimate algorithm that can efficiently tackle this problem, both in terms of protein-ligand docking quality and speed. This argument motivates devising new algorithms, tailored to the particular protein-ligand docking scenarios. To this end, this paper reports a machine learning-based approach for improved and robust docking performance. The proposed set-up is fully automated, operating without any expert opinion or involvement both on the problem and algorithm aspects. As a case study, an empirical analysis was performed on a well-known protein, Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE), with 1428 ligands. For general applicability, AutoDock 4.2 was used as the docking platform. The candidate algorithms are also taken from AutoDock 4.2. Twenty-eight distinctly configured Lamarckian-Genetic Algorithm (LGA) are chosen to build an algorithm set. ALORS which is a recommender system-based algorithm selection system was preferred for automating the selection from those LGA variants on a per-instance basis. For realizing this selection automation, molecular descriptors and substructure fingerprints were employed as the features characterizing each target protein-ligand docking instance. The computational results revealed that algorithm selection outperforms all those candidate algorithms. Further assessment is reported on the algorithms space, discussing the contributions of LGA's parameters. As it pertains to protein-ligand docking, the contributions of the aforementioned features are examined, which shed light on the critical features affecting the docking performance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsHumansLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID37217655
PMCPMC10201035
OpenAlexW4377293862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.