Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217515›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2023

Cell type specific transcriptomic differences in depression show similar patterns between males and females but implicate distinct cell types and genes.

Malosree Maitra, Haruka Mitsuhashi, Reza Rahimian, Anjali Chawla, Jennie Yang, Laura M Fiori, Maria Antonietta Davoli, Kelly Perlman, Zahia Aouabed, Deborah C Mash and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cellular transcriptomic signatures underpinning the heterogeneity of depression in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Malosree MaitraMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Haruka MitsuhashiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Reza RahimianMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Anjali ChawlaMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Jennie YangMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Laura M FioriMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Maria Antonietta DavoliMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Kelly PerlmanMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Zahia AouabedMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.
Deborah C MashDr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Matthew SudermanPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2715-9930
Naguib MechawarMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-756X
Gustavo Turecki *McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada. gustavo.turecki@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-2736
Corina Nagy *McGill Group for Suicide Studies, Douglas Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada. corina.nagy@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1439-0129

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_00032/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, heterogenous, and potentially serious psychiatric illness. Diverse brain cell types have been implicated in MDD etiology. Significant sexual differences exist in MDD clinical presentation and outcome, and recent evidence suggests different molecular bases for male and female MDD. We evaluated over 160,000 nuclei from 71 female and male donors, leveraging new and pre-existing single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cell type specific transcriptome-wide threshold-free MDD-associated gene expression patterns were similar between the sexes, but significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) diverged. Among 7 broad cell types and 41 clusters evaluated, microglia and parvalbumin interneurons contributed the most DEGs in females, while deep layer excitatory neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursors were the major contributors in males. Further, the Mic1 cluster with 38% of female DEGs and the ExN10_L46 cluster with 53% of male DEGs, stood out in the meta-analysis of both sexes.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscriptomeBrainDepressionFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID37217515
PMCPMC10203145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.