Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217332›Full record

ReviewAnnals of family medicine

The Impact of Interpersonal Continuity of Primary Care on Health Care Costs and Use: A Critical Review.

Andrew Bazemore, Zach Merenstein, Lara Handler, John W Saultz

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Development of a novel GP continuity measurement for practices without personal lists: a two-practice pilot of the modified SLICC.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Sustaining named GP continuity requires organisational change: a comparative implementation analysis in Finland.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  6. [A primary care system in Germany: evidence, opportunities, and implementation].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  7. Cost savings from primary care clinic continuity among patients with chronic disease in Alberta, Canada: a retrospective population-level cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  8. Continuity of care measurement across health systems: UK and US insights for global primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  9. Maintaining continuity in fragmented healthcare systems.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. The Power of Primary Care to Improve Health.Annals of family medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why has continuity of general practitioner care been neglected?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  19. Scottish GP walk-in centres: access at the expense of continuity?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew BazemoreAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky abazemore@theabfm.org.
Zach MerensteinCenter for Professionalism & Value in Healthcare, Washington, DC.
Lara HandlerAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
John W SaultzDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterpersonal continuity has been shown to play an essential role in primary care's salutary effects. Amid 2 decades of rapid evolution in the health care payment model, we sought to summarize the range of peer-reviewed literature relating continuity to health care costs and use, information critical to assessing the need for continuity measurement in value-based payment design.

methodsAfter comprehensively reviewing prior continuity literature, we used a combination of established medical subject headings (MeSH) and key words to search PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for articles published between 2002 and 2022 on "continuity of care" and "continuity of patient care," and payor-relevant outcomes, including cost of care, health care costs, cost of health care, total cost of care, utilization, ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, and hospitalizations for these conditions. We limited our search to primary care key words, MeSH terms, and other controlled vocabulary, including primary care, primary health care, family medicine, family practice, pediatrics, and internal medicine.

resultsOur search yielded 83 articles describing studies that were published between 2002 and 2022. Of these, 18 studies having a total of 18 unique outcomes examined the association between continuity and health care costs, and 79 studies having a total of 142 unique outcomes assessed the association between continuity and health care use. Interpersonal continuity was associated with significantly lower costs or more favorable use for 109 of the 160 outcomes.

conclusionsInterpersonal continuity today remains significantly associated with lower health care costs and more appropriate use. Further research is needed to disaggregate these associations at the clinician, team, practice, and system levels, but continuity assessment is clearly important to designing value-based payment for primary care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareHealth Care CostsChildHumanscontinuity of carehealth care costshealth care utilizationhealth policyhealth serviceshealth services needs and demandhealth services researchmeasurementprimary carevalue-based health care

Identifiers

PMID37217332
PMCPMC10202515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.