Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217308›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Dimensionality and Ramping: Signatures of Sentence Integration in the Dynamics of Brains and Deep Language Models.

Théo Desbordes, Yair Lakretz, Valérie Chanoine, Maxime Oquab, Jean-Michel Badier, Agnès Trébuchon, Romain Carron, Christian-G Bénar, Stanislas Dehaene, Jean-Rémi King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Initial organization and progressive expansion of the math-responsive brain network during the first school years.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Théo DesbordesMeta AI Research, Paris 75002, France; and Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit NeuroSpin center, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Yair LakretzCognitive Neuroimaging Unit NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91191, France.
Valérie ChanoineInstitute of Language, Communication and the Brain, Aix-en-Provence, 13100, France; and Aix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, LPL, Aix-en-Provence, 13100, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3492-8160
Maxime OquabMeta AI Research, Paris 75002, France.
Jean-Michel BadierAix Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence 13100; and Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, 13005, France.
Agnès TrébuchonAix Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France; and Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, 13005, France; and Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille, Timone hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rythmology, Marseille, 13385, France.
Romain CarronAix Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France; and Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, 13005, France; and Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille, Timone hospital, Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Marseille, 13385, France.
Christian-G BénarAix Marseille Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CNRS, LPL, Aix-en-Provence 13100, France; and Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, 13005, France.
Stanislas DehaeneUniversité Paris Saclay, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin center, Saclay, 91191, France; and Collège de France, PSL University, Paris, 75231, France stanislas.dehaene@gmail.com.
Jean-Rémi KingMeta AI Research, Paris 75002, France; and Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit NeuroSpin center, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sentence is more than the sum of its words: its meaning depends on how they combine with one another. The brain mechanisms underlying such semantic composition remain poorly understood. To shed light on the neural vector code underlying semantic composition, we introduce two hypotheses: (1) the intrinsic dimensionality of the space of neural representations should increase as a sentence unfolds, paralleling the growing complexity of its semantic representation; and (2) this progressive integration should be reflected in ramping and sentence-final signals. To test these predictions, we designed a dataset of closely matched normal and jabberwocky sentences (composed of meaningless pseudo words) and displayed them to deep language models and to 11 human participants (5 men and 6 women) monitored with simultaneous MEG and intracranial EEG. In both deep language models and electrophysiological data, we found that representational dimensionality was higher for meaningful sentences than jabberwocky. Furthermore, multivariate decoding of normal versus jabberwocky confirmed three dynamic patterns: (1) a phasic pattern following each word, peaking in temporal and parietal areas; (2) a ramping pattern, characteristic of bilateral inferior and middle frontal gyri; and (3) a sentence-final pattern in left superior frontal gyrus and right orbitofrontal cortex. These results provide a first glimpse into the neural geometry of semantic integration and constrain the search for a neural code of linguistic composition.

Indexed as

BrainLanguageBrain MappingFemaleHumansLinguisticsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReadingSemanticsdimensionalityintegrationintracraniallanguagerampingsemantic composition

Identifiers

PMID37217308
PMCPMC10359032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.