ArticleBMJ open2023
Evidence-based practice models and frameworks in the healthcare setting: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Limited Evidence to Fully Determine the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice by Healthcare Providers in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Clinical Nurse Specialists' Perceptions of Competency and Self-Efficacy in Evidence-Based Practice and Implementation Science.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Observational
- When evidence fails in real life: Rethinking sports injury rehabilitation and prevention.Brazilian journal of physical therapy · 2026Review
- Frameworks for Action: A Scoping Review of Organisational Patient Engagement Models in Healthcare.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- A Descriptive Evaluation of Evidence-Based Rounds in Critical Care Using Mixed Data Types.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Role of Evidence-Based Practice in Quality of Work Life Among Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Article
- Team-based learning in thoracic surgery nursing education: a mixed-methods study of effectiveness and learning experiences.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Effects of an evidence-based practice intensive on competency: a pre/post domain-level program evaluation.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Models of care for palliative care in residential aged care facilities: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Mapping review on breaking bad news and design of SAFE & CARING protocol for pediatric hematology-oncology.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Nurses experiences of adopting evidence-based practice in Saudi healthcare: organizational, educational, and cultural influences from qualitative focus groups.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nature prescription for patients with chronic respiratory diseases.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Review
- From Challenges to Change: Overcoming Hurdles to Clinician Driven Research.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Development and reporting of a specialised antenatal music therapy intervention using the MRC framework and TIDieR checklist.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Association Between Nursing Work Environment and Evidence-Based Practice.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2025Article
- Recommendations to mitigate barriers to uptake and delivery of a four-dose malaria vaccine schedule: insights from the MVIP's qualitative evidence.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Healthcare workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Collaboration for Recovery: Expert Mental Health Worker Experiences with the Recovery Assessment Scale - Domain and Stages (RAS-DS).Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Collaborative Practices in Mental Health Care: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this scoping review was to identify and review current evidence-based practice (EBP) models and frameworks. Specifically, how EBP models and frameworks used in healthcare settings align with the original model of (1) asking the question, (2) acquiring the best evidence, (3) appraising the evidence, (4) applying the findings to clinical practice and (5) evaluating the outcomes of change, along with patient values and preferences and clinical skills.
designA Scoping review. INCLUDED SOURCES AND ARTICLES: Published articles were identified through searches within electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) from January 1990 to April 2022. The English language EBP models and frameworks included in the review all included the five main steps of EBP. Excluded were models and frameworks focused on one domain or strategy (eg, frameworks focused on applying findings).
resultsOf the 20 097 articles found by our search, 19 models and frameworks met our inclusion criteria. The results showed a diverse collection of models and frameworks. Many models and frameworks were well developed and widely used, with supporting validation and updates. Some models and frameworks provided many tools and contextual instruction, while others provided only general process instruction. The models and frameworks reviewed demonstrated that the user must possess EBP expertise and knowledge for the step of assessing evidence. The models and frameworks varied greatly in the level of instruction to assess the evidence. Only seven models and frameworks integrated patient values and preferences into their processes.
conclusionMany EBP models and frameworks currently exist that provide diverse instructions on the best way to use EBP. However, the inclusion of patient values and preferences needs to be better integrated into EBP models and frameworks. Also, the issues of EBP expertise and knowledge to assess evidence must be considered when choosing a model or framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.