Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217235›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

A shared agenda for gender and COVID-19 research: priorities based on broadening engagement in science.

Asha S George, Claudia A Lopes, Lavanya Vijayasingham, Mamothena Carol Mothupi, Ronald Musizvingoza, Gita Mishra, Jacqui Stevenson, Michelle Remme

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Asha S GeorgeSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa asgeorge@uwc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-5968-1424
Claudia A LopesUnited Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lavanya VijayasinghamFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-4491
Mamothena Carol MothupiSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1139-1639
Ronald MusizvingozaUnited Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Gita MishraSchool of Public Health, Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9610-5904
Jacqui StevensonUnited Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Michelle RemmeUnited Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health · MYGlobal Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria · CHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of the Western Cape · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the acute and collective crisis from the pandemic is over, an estimated 2.5 million people died from COVID-19 in 2022, tens of millions suffer from long COVID and national economies still reel from multiple deprivations exacerbated by the pandemic. Sex and gender biases deeply mark these evolving experiences of COVID-19, impacting the quality of science and effectiveness of the responses deployed. To galvanise change by strengthening evidence-informed inclusion of sex and gender in COVID-19 practice, we led a virtual collaboration to articulate and prioritise gender and COVID-19 research needs. In addition to standard prioritisation surveys, feminist principles mindful of intersectional power dynamics underpinned how we reviewed research gaps, framed research questions and discussed emergent findings. The collaborative research agenda-setting exercise engaged over 900 participants primarily from low/middle-income countries in varied activities. The top 21 research questions included the importance of the needs of pregnant and lactating women and information systems that enable sex-disaggregated analysis. Gender and intersectional aspects to improving vaccine uptake, access to health services, measures against gender-based violence and integrating gender in health systems were also prioritised. These priorities are shaped by more inclusive ways of working, which are critical for global health as it faces further uncertainties in the aftermath of COVID-19. It remains imperative to address the basics in gender and health (sex-disaggregated data and sex-specific needs) and also advance transformational goals to advance gender justice across health and social policies, including those related to global research.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHumansLactationMalePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePublic PolicyCOVID-19Health policy

Identifiers

PMID37217235
PMCPMC10230361
OpenAlexW4377288297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.