Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217196›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of haematology2023

Final results of a phase II study of CHOEP plus lenalidomide as initial therapy for patients with stage II-IV peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Robert Stuver, Steven M Horwitz, Ranjana H Advani, Julie M Vose, Hun Ju Lee, Neha Mehta-Shah, Jasmine M Zain, Bradley Haverkos, Mary Jo Lechowicz, Alison J Moskowitz and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: What's Next?Hematological oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BV and beyond: how to incorporate novel agents into PTCL management.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  6. Failing Forward in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Emerging strategies in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Robert StuverMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-5170
Steven M HorwitzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-2006
Ranjana H AdvaniStanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Julie M VoseUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Hun Ju LeeMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7219-5562
Neha Mehta-ShahWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-0670
Jasmine M ZainCity of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Bradley HaverkosUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Mary Jo LechowiczEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alison J MoskowitzMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, New York, USA.
Luu Q PhamOakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA.
Elizabeth LeydenUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Stephen M AnsellMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-6758
Matthew A LunningUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USCity of Hope · USEmory University · USMayo Clinic · USOakland University · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There remains no one standard induction for nodal-based peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We conducted a phase II study of lenalidomide plus CHOEP as a novel induction strategy. Patients received CHOEP at standard doses in combination with 10 mg of lenalidomide on days 1-10 of a 21-day cycle for six cycles of therapy followed by observation, high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue, or maintenance lenalidomide per provider preference. Among 39 patients evaluable for efficacy, the objective response rate after six cycles was 69%, with complete response in 49%, partial response in 21%, stable disease in 0% and progressive disease in 13%. Thirty-two patients (82%) completed full induction, and seven patients (18%) discontinued for toxicity, primarily hematologic. Any grade hematologic toxicity occurred in over 50% of patients, with grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurring in 35% of patients despite mandated growth factors. With a median followup of surviving patients of 21.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free and overall survival were 55% (95% CI 37%-70%) and 78% (95% CI 59%-89%), respectively. In sum, six cycles of lenalidomide plus CHOEP resulted in a modest response rate primarily due to hematologic toxicity, which prevented all patients from completing planned induction.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, T-Cell, PeripheralAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansLenalidomideRemission InductionLenalidomideclinical trialslymphomasmalignant lymphomasnon-Hodgkins lymphomaT-cell lymphomatrials

Identifiers

PMID37217196
PMCPMC11220724
OpenAlexW4377233433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.