Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37217166›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

Comparison of a Urine Antigen Assay and Multiple Examinations with the Formalin-Ethyl Acetate Concentration Technique for Diagnosis of Opisthorchiasis.

Chanika Worasith, Anchalee Techasen, Kunyarat Duenngai, Kitti Intuyod, Kulthida Y Kopolrat, Jiraporn Sithithaworn, Watcharin Loilome, Thomas Crellen, Melissa R Haswell, Paiboon Sithithaworn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhanced detection ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chanika WorasithDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Anchalee TechasenCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kunyarat DuenngaiDepartment of Thai Traditional Medicine, Faculty of Science and Technology, Phetchabun Rajabhat University, Phetchabun, Thailand.
Kitti IntuyodCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kulthida Y KopolratFaculty of Public Health, Kasetsart University Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.
Jiraporn SithithawornFaculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Thomas CrellenSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Melissa R HaswellIndigenous Strategy and Services, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paiboon SithithawornDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Khon Kaen University · THPhetchabun Rajabhat University · THQueensland University of Technology · AUSakon Nakhon Rajabhat University · THUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 215919/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of worm antigen in urine is a sensitive diagnostic method for opisthorchiasis, particularly for light-intensity infections; however, the presence of eggs in feces is essential for validating results from the antigen assay. To address the issue of low sensitivity of fecal examination, we modified the protocol for the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) and compared it against urine antigen measurements for detection of the parasite Opisthorchis viverrini. First, we optimized the FECT protocol by increasing the number of drops for examinations from the standard two drops to a maximum of eight. We were able to detect additional cases after examination of ≥ 3 drops, and the prevalence of O. viverrini saturated after examination of ≥ 5 drops. We then compared the optimized FECT protocol (examining five drops of suspension) against urine antigen detection for the diagnosis of opisthorchiasis in field-collected samples. The optimized FECT protocol detected O. viverrini eggs in 25 of 82 individuals (30.5%) who had positive urine antigen tests but were fecal egg negative by the standard FECT protocol. The optimized protocol also retrieved O. viverrini eggs in 2 of 80 antigen-negative cases (2.5%). In comparison with the composite reference standard (combined FECT and urine antigen detection), the diagnostic sensitivity of examining two and five drops of FECT and the urine assay was 58.2, 67, and 98.8%, respectively. Our results show that multiple examinations of fecal sediment increase the diagnostic sensitivity of FECT and thus provide further support for the reliability and utility of the antigen assay for diagnosis and screening of opisthorchiasis.

Indexed as

OpisthorchiasisOpisthorchisAcetatesAnimalsFecesFormaldehydeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityThailandAcetatesethyl acetateFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID37217166
PMCPMC10324020
OpenAlexW4377237808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.