Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216851›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2023

Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography.

Samuel W Foster, Elisabeth P Gates, Paul A Peaden, Serguei V Calugaru, W Raymond West, Milton L Lee, James P Grinias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel W FosterDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, United States.
Elisabeth P GatesAxcend LLC, Provo, UT 84604, United States.
Paul A PeadenAxcend LLC, Provo, UT 84604, United States.
Serguei V CalugaruAxcend LLC, Provo, UT 84604, United States.
W Raymond WestAxcend LLC, Provo, UT 84604, United States.
Milton L LeeAxcend LLC, Provo, UT 84604, United States; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, United States.
James P GriniasDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, United States. Electronic address: grinias@rowan.edu.

Funding

Portable Liquid Chromatography Platform for Diverse Pharmaceutical ApplicationsR44GM137649 · NIGMS · AXCEND, LLC · PI LEE, MILTON L. · 2020 to 2022
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM137649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen significant advances in compact, portable capillary LC instrumentation. This study explores the performances of several commercially available columns within the pressure and flow limits of both the columns and one of these compact LC instruments. The commercially available compact capillary LC system with UV-absorbance detector used in this study is typically operated using columns in the 0.15-0.3 mm internal diameter (i.d.) range. Efficiency measurements (i.e., theoretical plates, N) for six columns with i.d.s in this range and of varying lengths and pressure limits, packed with stationary phases of different particle diameters and morphologies, were made using a mixture of standard alkylphenones. Kinetic plot comparisons between columns that vary by one (or more) of these parameters are described, along with calculated kinetic performance and Knox-Saleem limits. These theoretical performance descriptions provide insight into optimal operating conditions when using capillary LC systems. Based on kinetic plot evaluation of available capillary columns in the 0.2-0.3 mm i.d. range with a conservative upper pressure limit of 330 bar packed with superficially porous particles, a 25 cm column could generate ∼47,000 plates in 7.85 min when operated at 2.4 µL/min. For comparison, more robust 0.3 mm i.d. columns (packed with fully porous particles) that can be operated at higher pressures than can be provided by the pumping system (conservative pump upper pressure limit of 570 bar), a ∼20 cm column could generate nearly 40,000 plates in 5.9 min if operated at 6 µL/min. Across all capillary LC columns measured, higher pressure limits and shorter columns can provide the best throughput when considering both speed and efficiency.

Indexed as

Particle SizeChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidKineticsPorosityCapillary liquid chromatographyChromatographic efficiencyCompactKinetic plotPortable

Identifiers

PMID37216851
PMCPMC10259062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.