ArticleBlood2023
New ASH initiatives to improve patient care in the long-overlooked sickle cell disease.
Article in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemoglobinopathy diagnostics: the HELIOS Action survey.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Hydroxyurea in the sickle cell disease modern era.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Because of the unique biology of sickle cell disease (SCD) as well as the societal disadvantages and racial inequities suffered by these patients, individuals with SCD have not benefited from the same remarkable advances in care and therapeutics as those with other hematologic disorders. Life expectancy of individuals with SCD is shortened by ∼20 years even with optimal clinical care, and infant mortality continues to be a major concern in low-income countries. As hematologists, we must do more. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) and the ASH Research Collaborative have instituted a multipronged initiative to improve the lives of individuals living with this disease. Here, we describe 2 components of this ASH initiative, the Consortium on Newborn Screening in Africa (CONSA) to improve the early diagnosis of infants in low-resource countries and the SCD Clinical Trial Network to accelerate the development of more effective therapeutics and care for those with this disorder. The combination of SCD-focused initiatives, ASH Research Collaborative, CONSA, and Sickle Cell Clinical Trials Network has enormous potential to dramatically alter the course of SCD worldwide. We believe that the timing is ripe to embark on these critical and worthwhile initiatives and improve the lives of individuals with this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.