Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216670›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

(Quasi) multitask support vector regression with heuristic hyperparameter optimization for whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a case study with carcass traits in broilers.

Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves, Arthur Francisco Araujo Fernandes, Fernando Brito Lopes, Vivian Breen, Rachel Hawken, Daniel Gianola, Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anderson Antonio Carvalho AlvesDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-0487
Arthur Francisco Araujo FernandesCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA.
Fernando Brito LopesCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA.
Vivian BreenCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA.
Rachel HawkenCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-2348
Daniel GianolaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães RosaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
John Brown University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates nonlinear kernels for multitrait (MT) genomic prediction using support vector regression (SVR) models. We assessed the predictive ability delivered by single-trait (ST) and MT models for 2 carcass traits (CT1 and CT2) measured in purebred broiler chickens. The MT models also included information on indicator traits measured in vivo [Growth and feed efficiency trait (FE)]. We proposed an approach termed (quasi) multitask SVR (QMTSVR), with hyperparameter optimization performed via genetic algorithm. ST and MT Bayesian shrinkage and variable selection models [genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP), BayesC (BC), and reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression] were employed as benchmarks. MT models were trained using 2 validation designs (CV1 and CV2), which differ if the information on secondary traits is available in the testing set. Models' predictive ability was assessed with prediction accuracy (ACC; i.e. the correlation between predicted and observed values, divided by the square root of phenotype accuracy), standardized root-mean-squared error (RMSE*), and inflation factor (b). To account for potential bias in CV2-style predictions, we also computed a parametric estimate of accuracy (ACCpar). Predictive ability metrics varied according to trait, model, and validation design (CV1 or CV2), ranging from 0.71 to 0.84 for ACC, 0.78 to 0.92 for RMSE*, and between 0.82 and 1.34 for b. The highest ACC and smallest RMSE* were achieved with QMTSVR-CV2 in both traits. We observed that for CT1, model/validation design selection was sensitive to the choice of accuracy metric (ACC or ACCpar). Nonetheless, the higher predictive accuracy of QMTSVR over MTGBLUP and MTBC was replicated across accuracy metrics, besides the similar performance between the proposed method and the MTRKHS model. Results showed that the proposed approach is competitive with conventional MT Bayesian regression models using either Gaussian or spike-slab multivariate priors.

Indexed as

ChickensMultifactorial InheritanceAnimalsBayes TheoremGenotypeHeuristicsModels, GeneticPhenotypegenetic algorithmGenomic PredictionGenPredkernel methodsmachine learningmultitrait modelsShared Data Resource

Identifiers

PMID37216670
PMCPMC10411556
OpenAlexW4377564972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.