Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216607›Full record

ArticleAsbestos and other elongate mineral particles : new and continuing challenges in the 21st century2021

Size Separation of Amosite by Filtration and Shaking Methods.

Taekhee Lee, Rachel Walker, Jon Hummer, Elizabeth Ashley, Steven Mischler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asbestos and other elongate mineral particles : new and continuing challenges in the 21st century, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taekhee LeeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Health Hazards Prevention Branch, 626 Cochrans Mill Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9865-9553
Rachel WalkerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Health Hazards Prevention Branch, 626 Cochrans Mill Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-1873
Jon HummerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Health Hazards Prevention Branch, 626 Cochrans Mill Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-5048
Elizabeth AshleyChemical and Biological Monitoring Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH 45213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5813-0209
Steven MischlerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Mining Research Division, Health Hazards Prevention Branch, 626 Cochrans Mill Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5360-2855
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study are (1) to separate fibrous grunerite (amosite) by its length using filtration and shaking techniques utilized in a previous study and (2) to create two distinct length groups (short and long) of the amosite with higher output in a cost-effective way. The shaking system included an electrodynamic exciter, a linear power amplifier, and an audio-frequency signal generator and was attached to a cowl sampler as a funnel loaded with a polycarbonate filter. A suspension of amosite was passed through the 10-μm pore size polycarbonate filter in the shaking system and was transferred to a filtration system through five different pore sizes of polycarbonate membrane filters in series from the top: 10-, 5-, 2-, 1-, and 0.2-μm pore sizes. Each polycarbonate filter was tightly clamped with two conductive 25-mm spacers with a 25-mm stainless steel support screen to prevent leakage. The amosite length and diameter were manually measured with images from a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). A sequence of fields was selected at random locations, and an image of each field was acquired. The length and width of approximately 500 fibers for each sample were measured with ImageJ software. Two significantly different length groups (short and long) of amosite were collected (

Indexed as

amositeasbestoselongate mineral particleslength separation

Identifiers

PMID37216607
PMCPMC10194352
OpenAlexW4200512304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.