Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216556›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Collective property rights lead to secondary forest growth in the Brazilian Amazon.

Kathryn Baragwanath, Ella Bayi, Nilesh Shinde

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indigenous territories and protected areas are crucial for ecosystem connectivity in the Amazon basin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Navigating data challenges in socioeconomic impact assessments of conservation regimes.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Ecological change increases malaria risk in the Brazilian Amazon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Collective property rights lead to secondary forest growth in the Brazilian Amazon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn BaragwanathInstitute for Humanities and Social Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-3506
Ella BayiDepartment of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.ORCID 0000-0001-7557-6985
Nilesh ShindeDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.ORCID 0000-0002-9117-2996
Australian Catholic University · AUColumbia University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests serve a crucial role in our fight against climate change. Secondary forests provide important potential for conservation of biodiversity and climate change mitigation. In this paper, we explore whether collective property rights in the form of indigenous territories (ITs) lead to higher rates of secondary forest growth in previously deforested areas. We exploit the timing of granting of property rights, the geographic boundaries of ITs and two different methods, regression discontinuity design and difference-in-difference, to recover causal estimates. We find strong evidence that indigenous territories with secure tenure not only reduce deforestation inside their lands but also lead to higher secondary forest growth on previously deforested areas. After receiving full property rights, land inside ITs displayed higher secondary forest growth than land outside ITs, with an estimated effect of 5% using our main RDD specification, and 2.21% using our difference-in-difference research design. Furthermore, we estimate that the average age of secondary forests was 2.2 y older inside ITs with secure tenure using our main RDD specification, and 2.8 y older when using our difference-in-difference research design. Together, these findings provide evidence for the role that collective property rights can play in the push to restore forest ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemOwnershipBrazilConservation of Natural ResourcesForestsAmazonBrazilcollective property rightsindigenous landssecondary forest growth

Identifiers

PMID37216556
PMCPMC10235932
OpenAlexW4377287727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.