Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216516›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Mechanosensitive stem cell fate choice is instructed by dynamic fluctuations in activation of Rho GTPases.

Rocío G Sampayo, Mason Sakamoto, Madeline Wang, Sanjay Kumar, David V Schaffer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Primate amnion development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Substrate stress relaxation regulates neural stem cell fate commitment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rocío G SampayoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-4871
Mason SakamotoDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0003-0010-8612
Madeline WangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0009-0000-8725-7930
Sanjay KumarDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0002-9996-4883
David V SchafferDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-0121
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Neural Stem Cell MechanoregulationR01NS074831 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Sanjay Kumar, DAVID V SCHAFFER · 2012 to 2026
$5.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the intricate process by which cells give rise to tissues, embryonic and adult stem cells are exposed to diverse mechanical signals from the extracellular matrix (ECM) that influence their fate. Cells can sense these cues in part through dynamic generation of protrusions, modulated and controlled by cyclic activation of Rho GTPases. However, it remains unclear how extracellular mechanical signals regulate Rho GTPase activation dynamics and how such rapid, transient activation dynamics are integrated to yield long-term, irreversible cell fate decisions. Here, we report that ECM stiffness cues alter not only the magnitude but also the temporal frequency of RhoA and Cdc42 activation in adult neural stem cells (NSCs). Using optogenetics to control the frequency of RhoA and Cdc42 activation, we further demonstrate that these dynamics are functionally significant, where high- vs. low-frequency activation of RhoA and Cdc42 drives astrocytic vs. neuronal differentiation, respectively. In addition, high-frequency Rho GTPase activation induces sustained phosphorylation of the TGFβ pathway effector SMAD1, which in turn drives the astrocytic differentiation. By contrast, under low-frequency Rho GTPase stimulation, cells fail to accumulate SMAD1 phosphorylation and instead undergo neurogenesis. Our findings reveal the temporal patterning of Rho GTPase signaling and the resulting accumulation of an SMAD1 signal as a critical mechanism through which ECM stiffness cues regulate NSC fate.

Indexed as

Neural Stem Cellsrho GTP-Binding Proteinscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell DifferentiationNeurogenesisrhoA GTP-Binding ProteinSignal Transductioncdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinrhoA GTP-Binding Proteinrho GTP-Binding ProteinsmechanobiologymechanosensingoptogeneticsRho GTPasesstem cells

Identifiers

PMID37216516
PMCPMC10235963
OpenAlexW4377293304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.