Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216126›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

2D materials readiness for the transistor performance breakthrough.

Qing Zhang, Chunsen Liu, Peng Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qing ZhangState Key Laboratory of ASIC and System, School of Microelectronics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Chunsen LiuState Key Laboratory of ASIC and System, School of Microelectronics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Peng ZhouState Key Laboratory of ASIC and System, School of Microelectronics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the size of the transistor scales down, this strategy has confronted challenges because of the fundamental limits of silicon materials. Besides, more and more energy and time are consumed by the data transmission out of transistor computing because of the speed mismatching between the computing and memory. To meet the energy efficiency demands of big data computing, the transistor should have a smaller feature size and store data faster to overcome the energy burden of computing and data transfer. Electron transport in two-dimensional (2D) materials is constrained within a 2D plane and different materials are assembled by the van der Waals force. Owning to the atomic thickness and dangling-bond-free surface, 2D materials have demonstrated advantages in transistor scaling-down and heterogeneous structure innovation. In this review, from the performance breakthrough of 2D transistors, we discuss the opportunities, progress and challenges of 2D materials in transistor applications.

Indexed as

Applied sciencesMaterials scienceNanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID37216126
PMCPMC10192534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.