ReviewiScience2023
Toward a framework for systemic multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment and management.
Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Advancing Systemic Risk Assessment for Complex, Interdependent Systems: A Research Agenda.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- A Nation of Disasters: Lessons on Systemic Risks and Cascading Impacts From Malawi's COVID-19 Experience.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
- Operationalizing systemic multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment: Lessons from the MYRIAD-EU framework.iScience · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal assessment of multi hazard risk using graph based analysis for case studies in India.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Strengthening disaster preparedness and health security in Niger state, Nigeria through a WHO STAR-based multi-hazard risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimising housing typology distributions for multi-hazard loss reductions in resource-constrained settings.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Understanding energy system dynamics in a changing climate: Insights for first responders and risk managers.iScience · 2025Review
- A systemic risk assessment methodological framework for the global polycrisis.Nature communications · 2025Review
- A single-building damage detection model based on multi-feature fusion: A case study in Yangbi.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our increasingly interconnected world, natural hazards and their impacts spread across geographical, administrative, and sectoral boundaries. Owing to the interrelationships between multi-hazards and socio-economic dimensions, the impacts of these types of events can surmount those of multiple single hazards. The complexities involved in tackling multi-hazards and multi-risks hinder a more holistic and integrative perspective and make it difficult to identify overarching dimensions important for assessment and management purposes. We contribute to this discussion by building on systemic risk research, especially the focus on interconnectedness, and suggest ways forward for an integrated multi-hazard and multi-risk framework that should be beneficial in real-world applications. In this article, we propose a six-step framework for analyzing and managing risk across a spectrum ranging from single-to multi- and systemic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.