Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37216060›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Effects of Structure and Meaning on Cortical Tracking of Linguistic Units in Naturalistic Speech.

Cas W Coopmans, Helen de Hoop, Peter Hagoort, Andrea E Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Delta-Band Neural Responses to Individual Words Are Modulated by Sentence Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Naturalistic Spoken Language Comprehension Is Supported by Alpha and Beta Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cas W CoopmansMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-3161
Helen de HoopCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-1146
Peter HagoortMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-7549
Andrea E MartinMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-7234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has established that cortical activity "tracks" the presentation rate of syntactic phrases in continuous speech, even though phrases are abstract units that do not have direct correlates in the acoustic signal. We investigated whether cortical tracking of phrase structures is modulated by the extent to which these structures compositionally determine meaning. To this end, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) of 38 native speakers who listened to naturally spoken Dutch stimuli in different conditions, which parametrically modulated the degree to which syntactic structure and lexical semantics determine sentence meaning. Tracking was quantified through mutual information between the EEG data and either the speech envelopes or abstract annotations of syntax, all of which were filtered in the frequency band corresponding to the presentation rate of phrases (1.1-2.1 Hz). Overall, these mutual information analyses showed stronger tracking of phrases in regular sentences than in stimuli whose lexical-syntactic content is reduced, but no consistent differences in tracking between sentences and stimuli that contain a combination of syntactic structure and lexical content. While there were no effects of compositional meaning on the degree of phrase-structure tracking, analyses of event-related potentials elicited by sentence-final words did reveal meaning-induced differences between conditions. Our findings suggest that cortical tracking of structure in sentences indexes the internal generation of this structure, a process that is modulated by the properties of its input, but not by the compositional interpretation of its output.

Indexed as

compositionalityEEGidiomsjabberwockymutual information

Identifiers

PMID37216060
PMCPMC10158633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.