Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215957›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology advances

Convection-enhanced delivery of immunomodulatory therapy for high-grade glioma.

Colin P Sperring, Michael G Argenziano, William M Savage, Damian E Teasley, Pavan S Upadhyayula, Nathan J Winans, Peter Canoll, Jeffrey N Bruce

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers of immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Colin P SperringDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Michael G ArgenzianoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
William M SavageDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Damian E TeasleyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Pavan S UpadhyayulaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Nathan J WinansDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Peter CanollDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7001-0226
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NY-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

Single Cell Analysis of the Infiltrative Margins of Glioblastoma and Post Treatment RecurrenceR01NS103473 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JEFFREY N BRUCE, Peter Canoll · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
CHRONIC CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY (CED) OF TOPOTECAN FOR GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA161404 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BRUCE, JEFFREY N · 2012 to 2017
$2.9M
The Brief Research in Aging and Interdisciplinary NeurosciencesT35AG044303 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Sachin Agarwal, Jennifer Jaie Manly · 2013 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161404NIA NIH HHS T35 AG044303NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis for glioblastoma has remained poor despite multimodal standard of care treatment, including temozolomide, radiation, and surgical resection. Further, the addition of immunotherapies, while promising in a number of other solid tumors, has overwhelmingly failed in the treatment of gliomas, in part due to the immunosuppressive microenvironment and poor drug penetrance to the brain. Local delivery of immunomodulatory therapies circumvents some of these challenges and has led to long-term remission in select patients. Many of these approaches utilize convection-enhanced delivery (CED) for immunological drug delivery, allowing high doses to be delivered directly to the brain parenchyma, avoiding systemic toxicity. Here, we review the literature encompassing immunotherapies delivered via CED-from preclinical model systems to clinical trials-and explore how their unique combination elicits an antitumor response by the immune system, decreases toxicity, and improves survival among select high-grade glioma patients.

Indexed as

convection-enhanced deliverydrug deliverygliomaimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37215957
PMCPMC10195574
OpenAlexW4366773362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.