ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Predicting methylation class from diffusely infiltrating adult gliomas using multimodality MRI data.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning for predicting glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q co-deletion in MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Diagnostics of Glial Brain Tumors: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- From Images to Genes: Radiogenomics Based on Artificial Intelligence to Achieve Non-Invasive Precision Medicine in Cancer Patients.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign Predicts DNA Methylation Subclass and CDKN2A/B Status in IDH-Mutant Astrocytomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Radiogenomic studies of adult-type diffuse gliomas have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to infer tumor attributes, including abnormalities such as IDH-mutation status and 1p19q deletion. This approach is effective but does not generalize to tumor types that lack highly recurrent alterations. Tumors have intrinsic DNA methylation patterns and can be grouped into stable methylation classes even when lacking recurrent mutations or copy number changes. The purpose of this study was to prove the principle that a tumor's DNA-methylation class could be used as a predictive feature for radiogenomic modeling. Methods: Using a custom DNA methylation-based classification model, molecular classes were assigned to diffuse gliomas in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. We then constructed and validated machine learning models to predict a tumor's methylation family or subclass from matched multisequence MRI data using either extracted radiomic features or directly from MRI images. Results: For models using extracted radiomic features, we demonstrated top accuracies above 90% for predicting IDH-glioma and GBM-IDHwt methylation families, IDH-mutant tumor methylation subclasses, or GBM-IDHwt molecular subclasses. Classification models utilizing MRI images directly demonstrated average accuracies of 80.6% for predicting methylation families, compared to 87.2% and 89.0% for differentiating IDH-mutated astrocytomas from oligodendrogliomas and glioblastoma molecular subclasses, respectively. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that MRI-based machine learning models can effectively predict the methylation class of brain tumors. Given appropriate datasets, this approach could generalize to most brain tumor types, expanding the number and types of tumors that could be used to develop radiomic or radiogenomic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.