ArticleHeliyon2023
Artificial intelligence to assist specialists in the detection of haematological diseases.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Haematologic Diagnostics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence, particularly the growth of neural network research and development, has become an invaluable tool for data analysis, offering unrivalled solutions for image generation, natural language processing, and personalised suggestions. In the meantime, biomedicine has been presented as one of the pressing challenges of the 21st century. The inversion of the age pyramid, the increase in longevity, and the negative environment due to pollution and bad habits of the population have led to a necessity of research in the methodologies that can help to mitigate and fight against these changes. The combination of both fields has already achieved remarkable results in drug discovery, cancer prediction or gene activation. However, challenges such as data labelling, architecture improvements, interpretability of the models and translational implementation of the proposals still remain. In haematology, conventional protocols follow a stepwise approach that includes several tests and doctor-patient interactions to make a diagnosis. This procedure results in significant costs and workload for hospitals. In this paper, we present an artificial intelligence model based on neural networks to support practitioners in the identification of different haematological diseases using only rutinary and inexpensive blood count tests. In particular, we present both binary and multiclass classification of haematological diseases using a specialised neural network architecture where data is studied and combined along it, taking into account the clinical knowledge of the problem, obtaining results up to 96% accuracy for the binary classification experiment. Furthermore, we compare this method against traditional machine learning algorithms such as gradient boosting decision trees and transformers for tabular data. The use of these machine learning techniques could reduce the cost and decision time and improve the quality of life for both specialists and patients while producing more precise diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.