Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215848›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Linlin Li, Xiaoyu Shen, Yuan Liang, Binru Li, Yiwei Si, Rui Ma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linlin LiMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu ShenMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Yuan LiangMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Binru LiMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Yiwei SiShenyang Medical College, No.146, Huanghebei Road, Shenyang, 110034, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Rui MaMedical Oncology Department of Thoracic Cancer (2), Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No.44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CNChina Medical University · CNShenyang Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Whether Methods: Embase, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases were retrieved to collect related publications. In diagnostic meta-analysis, the sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were calculated. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used in the prognostic meta-analysis. Sensitivity and publication analyses were conducted for potential heterogeneity sources. Results: The pooled SEN and SPE were 77% (72-81%) and 80% (75-84%) for 45 diagnostic studies. A higher diagnostic efficacy was obtained from NTx combining with other markers (AUC: 0.94 (0.92-0.96)) for bone metastasis of human cancers, especially for lung cancer (AUC: 0.87 (0.84-0.90)), breast cancer (AUC: 0.83 (0.79-0.86)) and prostate cancer (AUC: 0.88 (0.85-0.90)) in Asian people (AUC: 0.86 (0.83-0.89)). For the value of NTx on prognosis of human cancers with bone metastasis, the pooled HR was 2.12 (1.74-2.58) for high versus low NTx level, indicating high NTx level would increase the risk of poor overall survival. Conclusion: Our results indicated serum NTx combining with other markers can become a feasible biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction for bone metastasis of different cancers, including lung cancer, breast cancer and prostate cancer in Asian people.

Indexed as

Bone metastasisCancerDiagnosisNTxPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37215848
PMCPMC10199183
OpenAlexW4367624120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.