ArticleHeliyon2023
The influence of gravity on electrical impedance tomography measurements during upper body position change.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recommendations for lung ventilation and perfusion assessment with chest electrical impedance tomography in critically ill adult patients: an international evidence-based and expert Delphi consensus study.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Lung electrical impedance tomography during positioning, weaning and chest physiotherapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2025Review
- Multifrequency electrical impedance tomography (Mf-EIT) for the detection of breast cancer phantom anomalies.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Electrical impedance tomography as a bedside assessment tool for COPD treatment during hospitalization.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Effect of automated head-thorax elevation during chest compressions on lung ventilation: a model study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the influence of gravity on regional ventilation measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) with the standard electrode belt position at the 5th intercostal space during tilting from supine to sitting positions. Methods: A total of 30 healthy volunteers were examined prospectively in supine position during quiet tidal breathing. Subsequently, the bed was tilted so that the upper body of the subjects achieved 30, 60 and 90° every 3 min. Regional ventilation distribution and end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) were monitored with EIT throughout the whole experiment. Absolute tidal volumes were measured with spirometry and the volume-impedance ratio was calculated for each position. Results: The volume-impedance ratio did not differ statistically between the studied body positions but 11 subjects exhibited a large change in ratio at one of the positions (outside 99.3% coverage). In general, ventilation distribution became more heterogeneous and moved towards dorsal regions as the upper body was tilted to 90-degree position. EELI increased and tidal volume decreased. The lung regions identified at various positions differed significantly. Conclusion: Gravity has non-negligible influence on EIT data, as the upper body tilted from supine to sitting positions. The standard electrode belt position might be reconsidered if ventilation distribution is to be compared between supine and sitting positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.