Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215751›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Tru-Cut Biopsy in Gynecological Cancer: Adequacy, Accuracy, Safety and Clinical Applicability.

Mihaela Asp, Ingrida Mockute, Anna Måsbäck, Karina Liuba, Päivi Kannisto, Susanne Malander

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07264660 (Diagnostic Value of Transcervical True-Cut Biopsy in Uterine Masses), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07264660 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Value of Transcervical True-Cut Biopsy in Uterine Masses

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled42ConditionsUterine TumorArmsTranscervical True-Cut Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mihaela AspDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2130-5132
Ingrida MockuteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna MåsbäckDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Karina LiubaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Päivi KannistoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Susanne MalanderDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Tru-cut biopsy is a minimally invasive technique used to obtain tissue samples for the diagnosis of tumors, especially in patients where primary surgery is not indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the adequacy, accuracy and safety of the tru-cut biopsy for diagnosis in gynecological cancer. Methods: A retrospective population-based review of 328 biopsies was conducted. The indications for tru-cut biopsies were diagnosis of primary tumors, metastases of gynecological and non-gynecological tumors, and suspected recurrences. A tissue sample was considered adequate when the quality/quality was sufficient to identify the subtype/origin of the tumor. Potential factors affecting adequacy were analyzed using logistic regressions analyses. Accuracy was defined as agreement between the diagnosis of the tru-cut biopsy and the postoperative histology. The therapy plan was registered, and the clinical applicability of the tru-cut biopsy was investigated. Complications within 30 days after the biopsy procedure were registered. Results: In total, 300 biopsies were identified as tru-cut biopsies. The overall adequacy was 86.3%, varying between 80.8% and 93.5%, respectively, when performed by a gynecological oncologist or a gynecologist with a subspecialty in ultrasound diagnosis. Sampling of a pelvic mass had a lower adequacy (81.6%) compared with sampling of the omentum (93.9%) or carcinomatosis (91.5%). The accuracy was 97.5%, and the complication rate was 1.3%. Conclusion: The tru-cut biopsy is a safe and reliable diagnostic method with a high accuracy and a good adequacy, depending on the site of the tissue sample, indications for the biopsy and the experience of the operator.

Indexed as

accuracyadequacygynecological malignancytru-cut biopsyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37215751
PMCPMC10198176
OpenAlexW4377564236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.