Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215709›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2023

Potency testing of cell and gene therapy products.

Paula Salmikangas, Björn Carlsson, Christophe Klumb, Tatiana Reimer, Steffen Thirstrup

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A versatile cell line for establishing potency of cell type-specific AAV transgenes.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. From Pluripotency to Patients: Making Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) Therapies Safer.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. In vitro CAR-T cell killing: validation of the potency assay.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula SalmikangasNDA Group, Uplands Väsby, Sweden.
Björn CarlssonNDA Group, Uplands Väsby, Sweden.
Christophe KlumbNDA Group, Uplands Väsby, Sweden.
Tatiana ReimerNDA Group, Uplands Väsby, Sweden.
Steffen ThirstrupEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
European Medicines Agency · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potency is one of the critical quality attributes of biological medicinal products, defining their biological activity. Potency testing is expected to reflect the Mechanism of Action (MoA) of the medicinal product and ideally the results should correlate with the clinical response. Multiple assay formats may be used, both

Indexed as

ATMPbiological activitycell therapygene therapypotency

Identifiers

PMID37215709
PMCPMC10196484
OpenAlexW4377564583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.