ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Policy analysis in the field of rare diseases in China: a combined study of content analysis and Bibliometrics analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From presence to provenance: Building substantive infrastructure for China's rare disease ecosystem.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Policy lessons regarding medical security for rare diseases inChina: Insights from Zhejiang Province through the multiplestreams framework.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Medical security for rare disease patients in China: Insights from patients with Dravet syndrome.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Article
- Awareness of Duchenne muscular dystrophy among medical staff in China: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evolution and synergy of healthcare security policies for rare diseases in China: a quantitative content analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reconceiving orphan drug market exclusivity as a conditional public-law entitlement: a sustainable regulatory governance model with comparative lessons for China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Policy evaluation frameworks for rare diseases: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) in China: Advancing Awareness, Access, Advocacy and Alliances From the Greater Bay Area to the Global HAE Community.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Review
- A retrospective study of insurance coverage status and economic cost of rare diseases in Hainan Province.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Experiences of Family Members and Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Under the Multi-Level Medical Security System in Shaanxi Province, China: A Mixed Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The role of public health in rare diseases: hemophilia as an example.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Classification and epidemiologic analysis of 86 diseases inIntractable & rare diseases research · 2024Article
- Release and impact of China's "Second List of Rare Diseases".Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Chinese government has made significant strides in addressing the needs of individuals affected by rare diseases in recent years. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of national rare disease policies in China from 2009 to 2022, using a mixed-methods approach. Methods: A two-dimensional analytical framework, which includes policy tools and policy themes, is introduced to analyze the rare disease policies comprehensively. Drawing on the policy tools theory proposed by Rothwell and Zegveld, this paper evaluates the tools used in rare disease policies. Co-word analyses and network analyses are employed to identify key themes in rare disease policies and collaboration among government departments. Results: The rare disease policy landscape in China is undergoing rapid growth, with an increasing number of government departments involved in policy formulation. However, further collaboration between departments is needed to strengthen these policies. Environment-based and supply-based tools are preferred in rare disease policies. The policy themes can be grouped into four categories: (1) Registration, Approval and Supply of Rare Disease Drugs, (2) Construction of Diagnosis and Treatment System for Rare Diseases, (3) Development and Genericization of Rare Disease Drugs, and (4) Social Security for Patients with Rare Diseases. Discussion: The study provides valuable insights into the current state of rare disease policies in China and offers suggestions for policy improvement. The results show that the Chinese government has made efforts to address the needs of individuals affected by rare diseases, but there is still room for improvement. The collaboration between government departments needs to be strengthened to achieve better rare disease policies. The findings of this study have implications for other countries with similar healthcare systems and can contribute to a better understanding of the impact of rare disease policies on public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.