Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215686›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2023

Strategies Following Free Flap Failure in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review.

Isabelle T S Koster, Marieke P Borgdorff, Faridi S Jamaludin, Tim de Jong, Matthijs Botman, Caroline Driessen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Impact of pre-operative aspirin administration on free flap survival rate in lower extremity reconstructio n.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle T S KosterDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Marieke P BorgdorffDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Faridi S JamaludinAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Library AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Tim de JongDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Matthijs BotmanDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Caroline DriessenDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Free flap reconstructions are an important reconstructive option for soft tissue defects in mangled lower extremities. Microsurgery facilitates soft tissue coverage of defects that otherwise would result in amputation. However, the success rates of traumatic lower extremity free flap reconstructions remain lower than those in other locations. Nevertheless, post-free flap failure salvage strategies have rarely been addressed. Therefore, the current review aims to provide an overview of post-free flap failure strategies in lower extremity trauma and their subsequent outcomes. Methods: A search of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed on June 9, June 2021 using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) search terms: 'lower extremity', 'leg injuries', 'reconstructive surgical procedures', 'reoperation', 'microsurgery' and 'treatment failure'. This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Partial and total free flap failures after traumatic reconstruction were included. Results: Twenty-eight studies with a total of 102 free flap failures fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Following the total failure, a second free flap is the predominant reconstructive strategy (69%). In comparison to the failure rate of a first free flap (10%), the fate of a second free flap is less favorable with a failure rate of 17%. The amputation rate following flap failure is 12%. The risk of amputation increases between primary and secondary free flap failures. After partial flap loss, the preferred strategy is a split skin graft (50%). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the outcome of salvage strategies after free flap failure in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. This review provides valuable evidence to take into consideration in the decision-making regarding post-free flap failure strategies.

Indexed as

Flap failureFree flapLower extremityMicrosurgeryTraumatic injuriesTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37215686
PMCPMC10196772
OpenAlexW4361295987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.