Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215683›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2023

High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network transfer learning.

M N van Stigt, E A Groenendijk, H A Marquering, J M Coutinho, W V Potters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M N van StigtAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
E A GroenendijkAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H A MarqueringAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J M CoutinhoAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
W V PottersAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for Methods: Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as Results: The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned Conclusions: Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for Significance: Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.

Indexed as

ArtifactConvolutional neural networkDry electrodesElectroencephalographyTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37215683
PMCPMC10196906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.