Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215619›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2023

Complication and response assessment of high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy boost in neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with long-term outcomes.

Arefeh Saeedian, Marzieh Lashkari, Reza Ghalehtaki, Maryam Taherioun, Mahdieh Razmkhah, Ali Kazemian, Mahdi Aghili

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arefeh SaeedianRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marzieh LashkariRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza GhalehtakiRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam TaheriounRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdieh RazmkhahRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali KazemianRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi AghiliRadiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To identify efficacy, complication, and pathologic response of high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BRT) boost in neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) of locally advanced rectal cancer. Material and methods: Forty-four patients who met eligibility criteria were included in this non-randomized comparative study. Control group was recruited retrospectively. nCRT (50.40 Gy/28 fr. plus capecitabine 825 mg/m Results: From 44 patients in the case and control groups, pCR was 11 (50%) and 8 (36.4%), respectively ( Conclusions: Treatment schedule was well-tolerated, and neo-adjuvant HDR-BRT could achieve better T down-staging as a boost comparing with nCRT, without significant complication. However, the optimal dose and fractions in the context of HDR-BRT boost needs further studies.

Indexed as

boostbrachytherapydose escalationneo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapyrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37215619
PMCPMC10196729
OpenAlexW4376459692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.