Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215558›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2022

Canonical Sentence Processing and the Inferior Frontal Cortex: Is There a Connection?

Nicholas Riccardi, Chris Rorden, Julius Fridriksson, Rutvik H Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas RiccardiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-6100
Chris RordenDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-6142
Julius FridrikssonInstitute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-2045
Rutvik H DesaiDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7937-5109

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FRIDRIKSSON, JULIUS · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Semantic SystemsR01DC017162 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Sensory-Motor Systems and Conceptual Processing in the Healthy and Impaired BrainR01DC010783 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Conceptual System in the Healthy and Impaired BrainR56DC010783 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI DESAI, RUTVIK H · 2018 to 2018
$290k
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010783NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017162NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC010783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of left inferior frontal cortex (LIFC) in canonical sentence comprehension is controversial. Many studies have found involvement of LIFC in sentence production or complex sentence comprehension, but negative or mixed results are often found in comprehension of simple or canonical sentences. We used voxel-, region-, and connectivity-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM, RLSM, CLSM) in left-hemisphere chronic stroke survivors to investigate canonical sentence comprehension while controlling for lexical-semantic, executive, and phonological processes. We investigated how damage and disrupted white matter connectivity of LIFC and two other language-related regions, the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) and posterior temporal-inferior parietal area (LpT-iP), affected sentence comprehension. VLSM and RLSM revealed that LIFC damage was not associated with canonical sentence comprehension measured by a sensibility judgment task. LIFC damage was associated instead with impairments in a lexical semantic similarity judgment task with high semantic/executive demands. Damage to the LpT-iP, specifically posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), predicted worse sentence comprehension after controlling for visual lexical access, semantic knowledge, and auditory-verbal short-term memory (STM), but not auditory single-word comprehension, suggesting pMTG is vital for auditory language comprehension. CLSM revealed that disruption of left-lateralized white-matter connections from LIFC to LATL and LpT-iP was associated with worse sentence comprehension, controlling for performance in tasks related to lexical access, auditory word comprehension, and auditory-verbal STM. However, the LIFC connections were accounted for by the lexical semantic similarity judgment task, which had high semantic/executive demands. This suggests that LIFC connectivity is relevant to canonical sentence comprehension when task-related semantic/executive demands are high.

Indexed as

anterior temporal lobeBroca’s areaconnectivitylesion-symptom mappingsentence comprehensionstroke

Identifiers

PMID37215558
PMCPMC10158581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.