ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2023
Application of hydrogel wound dressings in cell therapy-approaches to assessment in vitro.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering-A Comparative Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell therapy is actively used to treat skin defects, particularly burn lesions. The effectiveness of its application may depend on the appropriate choice of wound dressings used together with any cellular material. The aim of the study was to investigate the interaction of 4 hydrogel dressings used in clinical practice with human cells in an in vitro model to determine if their use in combination with cell therapy is possible. The effect of the dressings on the growth medium was assessed by considering the changes caused in the medium's acid-base equilibrium (pH) and viscosity. Cytotoxicity was determined by applying an MTT-assay and by direct contact methods. Cell adhesion and viability on the dressing surfaces were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. Proliferative and secretory cell activity were determined concurrently. Characterized human dermal fibroblast cultures were used as the test cultures. Results: The tested dressings interacted differently with the growth medium and the test cultures. 1-day extracts of all dressings had almost no effect on the acid-base balance, but, after 7 days, the pH of the dressing Type 2 extract had sharply acidified. The viscosity of the media under the influence of dressings of Types 2 and 3 had also markedly increased. MTT-assays showed nontoxicity of all the 1-day-incubated dressing extracts, while incubation for 7-days resulted in extracts with evident cytotoxicity, which was reduced upon dilution. Cell adhesion to the surfaces of the dressings differed, being observed occurring on dressings 2 and 3, and to a limited extent on dressing 4. Cells under dressing 1 showed evident proliferative and secretory activity whereas the other dressings impaired either proliferation or secretion processes. These effects indicate that, in general, comprehensive studies including a variety of methodological approaches at the in vitro stage are needed to allow the selection of appropriate dressings if they are to be used in combination with cell therapy to act as cell carriers. Of those investigated, the Type 1 dressing can be recommended as a protective dressing for use after transplantation of cells into a wound defect area by some other method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37215513PMC10195216W4377564535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.