ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2023
Does the residual displacement of pelvic ring affect the functional outcome in pelvic ring injures?
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted closed reduction and navigated fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a focused narrative review of a reduction-fixation-audit framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Outcome of pelvic ring injuries.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe effects of residual displacement on the functional outcome of the patient are not distinctly known and the acceptability criteria of residual displacement of the pelvic ring remain disputed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of residual displacement on functional outcome in pelvic ring injuries. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 49 patients with pelvic ring injuries (both operative and non-operative) were followed up for six months. Anteroposterior (AP), Vertical and rotational displacements were measured at admission, after surgery and at six months. Resultant displacement (vector addition of AP and vertical displacement) was taken for comparison. Displacement was graded as excellent, good, fair and poor according to Matta's criteria. Functional outcome assessment was done at six months using Majeed score. Work adjusted Majeed score was calculated for non-working patients by taking the percentage score.
resultsWe compared the means of residual displacement with functional outcome (Excellent/Good/Fair) and found that there was no significant difference between the groups in operative (P=0.33) or non-operative patients (P=0.09). This showed that patients with relatively higher residual displacement also had satisfactory functional outcomes. The functional outcomes were compared after dividing the residual displacement into 2 groups: <10 mm and >10 mm and no significant difference was found in outcomes for either operative or non-operative patients.
conclusionUp to 10 mm of residual displacement is acceptable in pelvic ring injuries. More prospective studies with a longer follow up are needed for determination of correlation between reduction and functional outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37215508PMC10195215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.