ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
An insider's perspective on FDA approval of aducanumab.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal clinical outcomes after amyloid clearance in aducanumab phase 3 studies.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Trial
- Lower baseline amyloid beta burden is associated with greater percent of amyloid beta positron emission tomography reduction and better clinical outcomes in the aducanumab Phase 3 trials ENGAGE and EMERGE in early Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Trial
- Could the cognitive benefits of amyloid-beta clearance grow in time for Alzheimer's disease?Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- A review of evidence supporting amyloid beta reduction as a surrogate endpoint in Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Deciphering the Structural Biology of GFAP: Connotations of Its Potency in Presaging the Diagnosis for Traumatic Brain Injury and AD.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Translational Medicine in Alzheimer's Disease: The Journey of Donanemab From Discovery to Clinical Application.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Sex and gender differences in access, quality of care, and effectiveness of treatment in dementia: a scoping review of studies up to 2024.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Quantitative 3D histochemistry reveals region-specific amyloid-β reduction by the antidiabetic drug netoglitazone.PloS one · 2025Article
- The case for regulatory approval of amyloid-lowering immunotherapies in Alzheimer's disease based on clearcut biomarker evidence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Article
- Immunotherapy for Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: A Promising Disease-Modifying Therapy.Cells · 2024Review
- Passive Anti-Amyloid Beta Immunotherapies in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Impact.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Article
- Cancer drugs with high repositioning potential for Alzheimer's disease.Expert opinion on emerging drugs · 2023Review
- Accelerating Alzheimer's therapeutic development: The past and future of clinical trials.Cell · 2023Review
- Anti-Amyloid Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease and the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Commentaries: Lecanemab: pioneering the way as the first approved drug for Alzheimer's disease treatment.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023Article
- Cognitive reserve as a predictor of cognitive decline, but not age of diagnosis in patients with possible young-onset Alzheimer's disease: An underexplored population.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aducanumab was approved in 2021 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the accelerated approval pathway. Since then, there have been many misconceptions about the approval decision despite multiple publications from the FDA to explain the rationale. Methods: Even though the FDA's final decision was accelerated approval, the Office of Clinical Pharmacology recommended regular/full approval based on its own analyses. Exposure-response analyses were conducted to quantify the relationship between aducanumab longitudinal exposure and responses (standardized uptake values ratios for amyloid beta and various clinical endpoints) in all clinical trials. To explain the difference between aducanumab and other compounds with negative results in the past, publicly available data were combined with the aducanumab data to demonstrate the relationship between amyloid reduction and clinical endpoint change across multiple compounds with similar mechanism of action. The probability to observe the overall positive findings in the aducanumab program was quantified under the assumption that aducanumab is ineffective. Results: Positive exposure-response (disease progression) relationship for multiple clinical endpoints from all clinical trials was identified. Positive exposure-amyloid reduction relationship was established. Consistent amyloid reduction-clinical endpoint change relationship across multiple compounds was observed. If aducanumab is assumed to be ineffective, it is extremely unlikely we would observe the overall positive findings in the aducanumab program. Conclusion: These results provided convincing evidence to support aducanumab's effectiveness. In addition, the observed effect size in the studied patient population represents a clinically meaningful benefit given the magnitude of disease progression within the trial duration. Highlights: Totality of evidence supports the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s approval decision for aducanumab.Different opinions were clearly explained in the FDA's public reviews from different disciplines.Readers are encouraged to read the FDA's reviews to understand the FDA's rationale to approve aducanumab.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.