Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215067›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2023

Assessing the impact of neurosurgery and neuroanatomy simulation using 3D non-cadaveric models amongst selected African medical students.

Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing, Ubraine Njineck Wunde, Yvan Zolo, Geneviève Endalle, Dieunedort Arnold Menga Djaowé, Léopoldine Sybile Ngoune Tatsadjieu, Ines Miste Zourmba, Aminatou Dadda, Roland Ndouh Nchufor, Cyrille Duquesne Nkouonlack and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Berjo Dongmo TakoutsingResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Ubraine Njineck WundeResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Yvan ZoloResearch Department, Association of Future African Neurosurgeons, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Geneviève EndalleResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Dieunedort Arnold Menga DjaowéResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Léopoldine Sybile Ngoune TatsadjieuResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Ines Miste ZourmbaResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Aminatou DaddaResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Roland Ndouh NchuforFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon.
Cyrille Duquesne NkouonlackFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Ernestine Renée Atangana BikonoFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Jean Paul Oumarou MagadjiYaounde Military Hospital, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Casimir FankemYaounde Emergency Center, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Alain Bertrand Tchoupo JibiaFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Ignatius EseneResearch Division, Winners Foundation, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Fobang Foundation · CMUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMUniversity of Bamenda · CMUniversity of Buea · CMUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laboratory dissections are essential to acquire practical skills to perform neurosurgical procedures. Despite being traditionally done on cadavers, they are often unavailable and suffer from cultural barriers in the African context. Non-cadaveric UpSurgeOn neurosurgery models have been developed to bridge this barrier, providing an almost similar experience with the human body. This study aimed to assess the impact of the UpSurgeOn hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training amongst selected Cameroon medical students. Methods: An anonymous 35-item questionnaire was distributed online using Google drive systems to medical students who attended UpSurgeOn's hands-on-touch non-cadaver model training course. These questions aimed to capture data on previous experience with neuroanatomy and neurosurgery practicals and the perception, attitudes, and impact of the UpSurgeOn neurosurgery tool. Results: Eighty-six students completed the survey. The mean age was 21.2 ± 1.868 years, 61.6% were males with 62.8% of respondents being medical students in preclinical years. Before the training, 29.4% had a fair knowledge of neuroanatomy. Textbooks and Youtube videos were the main sources of neuroanatomy and neurosurgery knowledge for more than half of the respondents. Up to 91.5% had no prior exposure to a neuroanatomy/neurosurgery cadaver laboratory dissection, and 22.6% and 17.6% had witnessed and performed at least one craniotomy before, respectively. There were 11.1%, 15.5%, and 31.3% of our respondents who had used a surgical microscope, a neurosurgical instrument, and the UpSurgeOn Neurosurgery tool before, respectively. The majority perceived the UpSurgeOn tool easy to use and felt they needed to learn just a few things before getting going with the box. Most thought of increasing the use of the UpSurgeOn Box and saw the need to be part of the training curriculum. Finally, the majority felt this tool helped to increase familiarity and acquire neurosurgical skills, and to develop the orientation skills needed during neurosurgical approaches. Conclusion: Undergraduate exposure to traditional neurosurgery/neuroanatomy labs is limited in Cameroon. Neurosurgery/neuroanatomy practical skills are gained essentially using non-practical means. Most students found the UpSurgeOn tool user-friendly, saw the need to incorporate it as part of their training, and perceived it to be essential in getting acquainted with neurosurgical skills.

Indexed as

braincadaverCameroonneuroanatomyneurosurgerysimulatorstudentsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37215067
PMCPMC10192731
OpenAlexW4368367940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.