Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37215046›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

MscS inactivation and recovery are slow voltage-dependent processes sensitive to interactions with lipids.

Madolyn Britt, Elissa Moller, Joseph Maramba, Andriy Anishkin, Sergei Sukharev

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madolyn Britt
Elissa Moller
Joseph Maramba
Andriy Anishkin
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

A Comprehensive approach to bacterial osmotoleranceR01AI135015 · NIAID · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SUKHAREV, SERGEI I · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI135015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanosensitive channel MscS, the major bacterial osmolyte release valve, shows a characteristic adaptive behavior. With a sharp onset of activating tension, the channel population readily opens, but under prolonged action of moderate near-threshold tension, it inactivates. The inactivated state is non-conductive and tension-insensitive, which suggests that the gate gets uncoupled from the lipid-facing domains. The kinetic rates for tension-driven opening-closing transitions are 4-6 orders of magnitude higher than the rates for inactivation and recovery. Here we show that inactivation is augmented and recovery is slowed down by depolarization. Hyperpolarization, conversely, impedes inactivation and speeds up recovery. We then address the question of whether protein-lipid interactions may set the rates and influence voltage dependence of inactivation and recovery. Mutations of conserved arginines 46 and 74 anchoring the lipid-facing helices to the inner membrane leaflet to tryptophans do not change the closing transitions, but instead change the kinetics of both inactivation and recovery and essentially eliminate their voltage-dependence. Uncharged polar substitutions (S or Q) for these anchors produce functional channels but increase the inactivation and reduce the recovery rates. The data suggest that it is not the activation and closing transitions, but rather the inactivation and recovery pathways that involve substantial rearrangements of the protein-lipid boundary associated with the separation of the lipid-facing helices from the gate. The discovery that hyperpolarization robustly assists MscS recovery indicates that membrane potential can regulate osmolyte release valves by putting them either on the 'ready' or 'standby' mode depending on the cell's metabolic state.

Identifiers

PMID37215046
PMCPMC10197514
OpenAlexW4376118596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.