ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Insights from a genome-wide truth set of tandem repeat variation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tools for genotyping tandem repeats (TRs) from short read sequencing data have improved significantly over the past decade. Extensive comparisons of these tools to gold standard diagnostic methods like RP-PCR have confirmed their accuracy for tens to hundreds of well-studied loci. However, a scarcity of high-quality orthogonal truth data limited our ability to measure tool accuracy for the millions of other loci throughout the genome. To address this, we developed a TR truth set based on the Synthetic Diploid Benchmark (SynDip). By identifying the subset of insertions and deletions that represent TR expansions or contractions with motifs between 2 and 50 base pairs, we obtained accurate genotypes for 139,795 pure and 6,845 interrupted repeats in a single diploid sample. Our approach did not require running existing genotyping tools on short read or long read sequencing data and provided an alternative, more accurate view of tandem repeat variation. We applied this truth set to compare the strengths and weaknesses of widely-used tools for genotyping TRs, evaluated the completeness of existing genome-wide TR catalogs, and explored the properties of tandem repeat variation throughout the genome. We found that, without filtering, ExpansionHunter had higher accuracy than GangSTR and HipSTR over a wide range of motifs and allele sizes. Also, when errors in allele size occurred, ExpansionHunter tended to overestimate expansion sizes, while GangSTR tended to underestimate them. Additionally, we saw that widely-used TR catalogs miss between 16% and 41% of variant loci in the truth set. These results suggest that genome-wide analyses would benefit from genotyping a larger set of loci as well as further tool development that builds on the strengths of current algorithms. To that end, we developed a new catalog of 2.8 million loci that captures 95% of variant loci in the truth set, and created a modified version of ExpansionHunter that runs 2 to 3x faster than the original while producing the same output.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.