ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
Topical treatment of oral chronic graft-versus-host- disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study systematically reviewed Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) with the objective to investigate the effectiveness and side effects of topical agents used for the treatment of oral GVHD. Material and Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to perform this study. An electronic search of four databases was conducted. RCTs published between January 2011 and March 2022 were included that were carried out on hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving topical treatment for oral GVHD. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) standard checklist for RCTs was used for the bias risk evaluation. Results: Five RCTs were included for the qualitative synthesis of results. Two RCTs were linked to a certain risk of bias. Budesonide caused the highest overall treatment response. Malic acid, clobetasol, and dexamethasone increased resting salivary flow rates. Curcumin in orabase shows similar results to corticosteroid treatment. Adverse effects were observed in populations receiving budesonide, dexamethasone, clobetasol, and tacrolimus. Most frequent adverse effects were burning sensations, fungal infections, and gastrointestinal disorders, but none of them were severe. Conclusions: Given the small number of RCTs performed and the heterogeneity of the different study designs, it is difficult to draw direct comparisons. Malic acid appears to be effective for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease-induced xerostomia. Budesonide had the highest overall response rates but was also associated with the highest number of adverse effects. Further research is needed to manifest those findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.