ArticleACS omega2023
Injectable Self-Setting Ternary Calcium-Based Bone Cement Promotes Bone Repair.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrogel-integrated osteogenic microtissues promote repair of infected intervertebral defects through sequential immunomodulation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Metabolism-Regulating Microspheres: Design Principles, Therapeutic Applications Across Multisystem Diseases, and Future Perspectives.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Cryogenic 3D-printed PLGA/nano-selenium scaffold for bone regeneration: a dual-functional strategy synergistically regulating macrophage polarization and osteogenic differentiation.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
- Pioneering nanomedicine in orthopedic treatment care: a review of current research and practices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone defects, especially large ones, are clinically difficult to treat. The development of new bone repair materials exhibits broad application prospects in the clinical treatment of trauma. Bioceramics are considered to be one of the most promising biomaterials owing to their good biocompatibility and bone conductivity. In this study, a self-curing bone repair material having a controlled degradation rate was prepared by mixing calcium citrate, calcium hydrogen phosphate, and semi-hydrated calcium sulfate in varying proportions, and its properties were comprehensively evaluated. In vitro cell experiments and RNA sequencing showed that the composite cement activated PI3K/Akt and MAPK/Erk signaling pathways to promote osteogenesis by promoting the proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. In a rat model with femoral condyle defects, the composite bone cement showed excellent bone repair effect and promoted bone regeneration. The injectable properties of the composite cement further improved its practical applicability, and it can be applied in bone repair, especially in the repair of irregular bone defects, to achieve superior healing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.