ReviewDigital health
Wearable sensors and features for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible and Self-Powered Wearable Sensors for Tremor Monitoring in Parkinson'S Disease: Recent Advances in Materials and Device Architectures.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Wearable sensing for quantifying cognitive and balance functions in naturalistic movements of older adults with mild cognitive impairment in therapeutic environments.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Design, Implementation, and Advances in Indirect SERS Sensors for Biomedical and Human-Health-Related Analyte Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Wearable inertial device for monitoring Parkinson's disease symptoms: a pilot study in a controlled environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gait-Based Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Fast and Objective Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Innovative Sensor-Based Approaches for Assessing Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Brief State-of-the-Art Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Influence of Gait Speed on Inter-Joint Coordination in People with and Without Parkinson's Disease.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Sleep as the Foundation of Brain Health.Seminars in neurology · 2025Review
- Editorial: Assessment and monitoring of human movement.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Variational mode decomposition-based EEG analysis for the classification of disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Promoting child and adolescent health through wearable technology: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neurodegenerative diseases affect millions of families around the world, while various wearable sensors and corresponding data analysis can be of great support for clinical diagnosis and health assessment. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research that uses wearable sensors and features for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of studies published between 2015 and 2022 in major scientific databases such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopes. The obtained studies were analyzed and organized into the process of diagnosis: wearable sensors, feature extraction, and feature selection. Results: The search led to 171 eligible studies included in this overview. Wearable sensors such as force sensors, inertial sensors, electromyography, electroencephalography, acoustic sensors, optical fiber sensors, and global positioning systems were employed to monitor and diagnose neurodegenerative diseases. Various features including physical features, statistical features, nonlinear features, and features from the network can be extracted from these wearable sensors, and the alteration of features toward neurodegenerative diseases was illustrated. Moreover, different kinds of feature selection methods such as filter, wrapper, and embedded methods help to find the distinctive indicator of the diseases and benefit to a better diagnosis performance. Conclusions: This systematic review enables a comprehensive understanding of wearable sensors and features for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.