Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214633›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2023

The Efficacy of Graded Motor Imagery and Its Components on Phantom Limb Pain and Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Katleho Limakatso, Aidan G Cashin, Sam Williams, Jack Devonshire, Romy Parker, James H McAuley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06167330 (TITAN), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06167330 narecruitingnot on this map

TITAN: a Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Effectiveness of Two Treatment Programs for Reducing Phantom Limb Pain Intensity and Its Interference with Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuroscience Research AustraliaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled208ConditionsPhantom Limb Pain, AmputationArmsProgressive rehabilitation program, Stimulation devices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katleho LimakatsoSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7906-4415
Aidan G CashinSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4190-7912
Sam WilliamsSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jack DevonshireSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-9673
Romy ParkerPain Management Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-2487
James H McAuleySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0550-828X
UNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) is a non-invasive and inexpensive therapy used to treat Phantom Limb Pain (PLP) by sequentially activating motor networks in such a way that movement and pain are unpaired. The objective of this systematic review was to critically appraise relevant data on the efficacy of GMI and its components for reducing PLP and disability in amputees. Methods: We searched 11 electronic databases for controlled trials investigating GMI and its components in amputees with PLP from inception until February 2023. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted relevant data. Study-level data were entered using the inverse variance function of the Review Manager 5 and pooled with the random effects model. Results: Eleven studies with varying risk of bias were eligible. No eligible study considered left/right judgement tasks in isolation. Studies showed no effect for imagined movements, but positive effects were seen for GMI [weighted mean difference: -21.29 (95%CI: -31.55, -11.02), I Conclusion: Our findings suggest that GMI and mirror therapy may be effective for reducing PLP. However, this conclusion was drawn from a limited body of evidence, and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Therefore, rigorous, high-quality trials are needed to address the gap in the literature and inform practice.

Indexed as

amputationgraded motor imageryimagined movementsleft/right judgmentsmirror therapyPhantom limb pain

Identifiers

PMID37214633
PMCPMC10193907
OpenAlexW4324348512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.