Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214628›Full record

ReviewNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Clear Theories Are Needed to Interpret Differences: Perspectives on the Bilingual Advantage Debate.

Angela de Bruin, Anthony Steven Dick, Manuel Carreiras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Factors Affecting Verbal Fluency in Healthy Aging.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Voir La Vie Sans Rose-Colored Glasses.Experimental psychology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angela de BruinDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Anthony Steven DickDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Manuel CarreirasBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-7613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heated debate regarding bilingual cognitive advantages remains ongoing. While there are many studies supporting positive cognitive effects of bilingualism, recent meta-analyses have concluded that there is no consistent evidence for a

Indexed as

bilingual advantagebilingualismbrain plasticityexecutive controlinhibitionlanguage control

Identifiers

PMID37214628
PMCPMC10158573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.