Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214505›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

A qualitative assessment of adolescent perspectives on patient education in the outpatient setting.

Nicole Meyers, Michelle Kaminski, Samuel Master, Marina Catallozzi, Suzanne Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole MeyersDepartment of Pediatrics, NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, 630 W 168th Street, PH 5, East Room 520, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Michelle KaminskiColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Samuel MasterDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Marina CatallozziColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Suzanne FriedmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore adolescent perspectives on the content and delivery of anticipatory guidance (AG), both during and after outpatient visits, in order to develop targeted resources and educational material for adolescent patients. Methods: Semi-structured phone interviews among patients ages 12 to 21 seen between May-July 2021 at four outpatient sites of NewYork Presbyterian Hospital were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Content domains included attitudes toward and preferences around AG, discharge instructions and patient education resources. Results: Twenty-eight of 156 recruited patients completed interviews; 52% received an After Visit Summary (AVS); of the 48% who did not receive it, half of them expressed interest in receiving one. Themes included positive perceptions of the AVS, patient-physician communication, multimodal delivery of educational materials, and critical discussion topics such as mental health and nutrition. Conclusion: Adolescents value the AVS and prefer multimodal materials and topics that are specifically geared towards them, rather than their caregivers. Innovation: This study is the first to explore adolescent perspectives on AG and after-visit informational materials. These findings may help more effectively reach, educate and engage adolescent patients in the primary care setting by guiding the focused development of patient-centered instructions and resources.

Indexed as

Adolescent healthAfter-visit summariesAnticipatory guidancePatient-centered carePatient engagementQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID37214505
PMCPMC10194254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.