Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214497›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

A feasibility study to understand the components of behavioral sleep extension.

Kelly G Baron, Sarah R Trela-Hoskins, Jennifer Duffecy, Chelsea M Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly G BaronDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Sarah R Trela-HoskinsDepartment of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Jennifer DuffecyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Chelsea M AllenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the contribution of sleep extension intervention components (wearable sleep tracker and coaching) on sleep extension outcomes. Patient involvement: This study collected open ended qualitative responses of treatment preference, acceptability, and feasibility as a key outcome. Methods: Adults aged 25 to 65 years with sleep duration <7 h and BMI ≥ 25 were randomized into one of four groups: Self-Management (control), Fitbit, Telephone Coaching, or Fitbit + Coaching. Self-report questionnaires and actigraphy were completed at baseline, post-intervention (6 weeks), and 12-weeks. Analyses used mixed models. Results: Among the 38 adults randomized, the Fitbit + Coaching group had larger but non-significant improvements in sleep duration compared with the self-management group. The coaching group demonstrated significant improvements in sleep-related impairment. All groups demonstrated feasibility and acceptability but the Fitbit + Coaching group reported themes of accountability. Conclusions: Results suggest that sleep extension interventions are feasible and acceptable but components affect the pattern of sleep and other outcomes. Practical implications: Sleep extension is feasible and acceptable; the combination of coaching and the wearable device may lead to larger changes in sleep due to enhanced accountability.

Indexed as

CoachingSleepSleep extensionWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID37214497
PMCPMC10194216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.