Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214402›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Prediction of recurrence of ischemic stroke within 1 year of discharge based on machine learning MRI radiomics.

Jianmo Liu, Yifan Wu, Weijie Jia, Mengqi Han, Yongsen Chen, Jingyi Li, Bin Wu, Shujuan Yin, Xiaolin Zhang, Jibiao Chen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application of radiomics in ischemic stroke.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianmo Liu *Department of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yifan Wu *Department of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Weijie JiaDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Mengqi HanDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yongsen ChenDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jingyi LiDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Bin WuDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Shujuan YinDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaolin ZhangDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jibiao ChenDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Pengfei YuDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Haowen LuoDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jianglong TuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Fan ZhouDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xuexin ChengBiological Resource Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yingping YiDepartment of Medical Big Data Research Centre, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the value of a machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics model in predicting the risk of recurrence within 1 year following an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: The MRI and clinical data of 612 patients diagnosed with AIS at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from March 1, 2019, to March 5, 2021, were obtained. The patients were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups according to whether they had a recurrent stroke within 1 year after discharge. Randomized splitting was used to divide the data into training and validation sets using a ratio of 7:3. Two radiologists used the 3D-slicer software to label the lesions on brain diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI sequences. Radiomics features were extracted from the annotated images using the pyradiomics software package, and the features were filtered using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis. Four machine learning algorithms, logistic regression (LR), Support Vector Classification (SVC), LightGBM, and Random forest (RF), were used to construct a recurrence prediction model. For each algorithm, three models were constructed based on the MRI radiomics features, clinical features, and combined MRI radiomics and clinical features. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were used to compare the predictive efficacy of the models. Results: Twenty features were selected from 1,037 radiomics features extracted from DWI images. The LightGBM model based on data with three different features achieved the best prediction accuracy from all 4 models in the validation set. The LightGBM model based solely on radiomics features achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.65, 0.671, and 0.647, respectively, and the model based on clinical data achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.7, 0.799, 0.735, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the LightGBM model base on both radiomics and clinical features achieved the best performance with a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.85, 0.805, 0.789, respectively. Conclusion: The ischemic stroke recurrence prediction model based on LightGBM achieved the best prediction of recurrence within 1 year following an AIS. The combination of MRI radiomics features and clinical data improved the prediction performance of the model.

Indexed as

diffusion-weighted imagingischemic strokemachine learningradiomicsrecurrence prediction

Identifiers

PMID37214402
PMCPMC10192708
OpenAlexW4377564571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.