ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Effect of Infrapatellar Fat Pad Preservation vs Resection on Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patient with End-Stage Osteoarthritis.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infrapatellar Fat Pad in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The management of infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the subject of ongoing debate. There is conflicting evidence whether IPFP should be preserved or resected during TKA to improve clinical outcomes. This study sought to establish if there is a benefit of one over another in terms of clinical function & patient satisfaction. Material & Methods: Total of 67 patients (96 knees), 11 males & 56 females with a mean age of 66.29 years, who underwent TKA between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. The planning for IPFP preservation (IPFP-P) on right side (50 knees) & IPFP resection (IPFP-R) on left side (46 knees) was done prospectively. We prospectively evaluated clinical outcomes post-TKA, comparing the right knee to the left knee in terms of IPFP-P vs IPFP-R using the oxford knee scoring (OKS) system. The SF-12 was used to evaluate and compare patient satisfaction between the two groups. Results: The mean OKS in the IPFP-P group was 42.86 ± 2.63 & in the IPFP-R group was 44.22 ± 2.40. The OKS differed significantly between the two groups ( Conclusion: Our study shows that IPFP-R gave marginally better patient-reported functional outcome scores (OKS), but there was no difference in patient satisfaction (SF-12 scores) between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.